climate change

Climate Emergency Manchester are running a campaign calling for the a seventh scrutiny committee to be set up at Manchester City Council, to make sure the council is sticking to its climate change commitments. In this guest post from Stitched Up, Marc Hudson of CEM answers questions about why they started this campaign and its importance in combating the climate crisis.

We spoke with Marc from Climate Emergency Manchester about the campaign for a seventh scrutiny committee to oversee the Council’s progress against climate change promises.

Read on to find out why CEM think this is a vital step in helping Manchester achieve its ambitious targets, and sign the petition if you agree!

What are Manchester City Council’s scrutiny committees and what do they do? 

There are currently six committees: 

  • Resources and Governance; 
  • Neighbourhoods and Environment; 
  • Health; 
  • Economy; 
  • Children’s and Young People; 
  • Communities and Equalities; 

Each committee meets ten times a year (not in August), for roughly two hours per meeting. The committee members (a selection of elected councillors) are supposed to be a watchdog and ask questions such as “hmmm, this isn’t going so well, hadn’t we better figure out why and make some changes?”

What influence do they have?

The influence of the scrutiny committees vary from issue to issue, depending on how well run they are, how much the particular executive members take on board what they hear.

Why do we need a SEVENth scrutiny committee?

We are stuck in a cycle where Manchester City Council, under pressure from activists, makes promises, then doesn’t follow through with implementation. The difficult decisions and trade-offs get ducked and dodged, and the can kicked down the road.

So, in 2009 Manchester City Council promised steep cuts in its own emissions as an organisation. But the cuts only only happened because of austerity (buildings sold, staff and services lost). The city’s emissions reductions are due to the National Grid burning less coal and using more wind / solar. More importantly, the promised “low carbon culture” has never eventuated.

The July 2019 Climate Emergency Declaration made a specific set of promises. Most of these have not been kept.

So, what to do now? Begging a largely unaccountable council executive (between elections) to take the issue seriously is a recipe for failure. It hasn’t worked (people have tried) and they can always decide to ignore you. Therefore we need a structural change in the way that progress or lack thereof is scrutinised. A seventh scrutiny committee, meeting ten times a year, with the time to dig down into the detail to get difficult questions answered, would mean that they could no longer be kicked down the road.

Who will be on the SEVENth scrutiny committee & what will they be able to do?

Who would be on the committee depends. Crucially, it would have equal standing with the existing six, so, i.e. same number of meetings per year, same length of meetings. The chair would be a Labour councillor, until such time as an opposition party has 10 or 16 councillors.

However, it could be more ambitious and include co-opted members of the public, from relevant organisations and areas of the city. This already happens in the Children and Young People Scrutiny Committee with seven co-opted members representing faith schools and parent governors who are able to vote when the Committee deals with matters relating to education functions. 

The 7th scrutiny committee could:

  • scrutinise what is being done by the Council about the Council’s own emissions (which are a relatively small part of the city’s overall emissions);
  • scrutinise the emission reduction plans the other organisations who are members of the “Climate Change Partnership”; scrutinise the Airport and recommend a transition plan be put in place for jobs and revenues that may be lost from less demand in flights due to climate action (Manchester City Council owns 35.5% of Manchester Airport Group);
  • ask officers to produce different and more accessible reports than they currently do helping push on for more learning from past mistakes (and successes) and from what is being done in other cities;
  • hold more public hearings to hear better ideas; or
  • model a different way of doing scrutiny and be a platform for better thinking at a city-level (as per this vision of what it could achieve, by Adam Williams of GND Podcast).

There’s a petition we can sign?

The online petition calling for a seventh scrutiny comittee is here (you have to register here) to sign it – and can only sign it if you live, work or study within Manchester City Council’s boundaries.

How will the petition help?

We expect that the process of getting people to sign the petition will:

Help them connect with each other, build their skills and confidence in taking action in their communities.

Help those who help out – even if they are only able to give a very small amount of time – learn new skills and innovate with new campaigning and communication techniques

Increase awareness about the current scrutiny set-up

Increase awareness about lack of real progress on climate action in this city (we have already burned through one quarter of our entire carbon budget for the 21st century) 

Knit together groups and individuals in loose networks, based on geography, interests etc, around wanting to see real ambitious action.

Boost climate campaigners’ morale (which is under constant attack)

Get councillors realising that a lot of people give a damn, which can empower them to be more ambitious in their demands from the council and the executive.

Get them thinking about whether existing scrutiny arrangements are fit for purpose (spoiler – no they aren’t)

How long Have We Got to sign it?

We have until Tuesday 10th November to submit our signatures.

What happens once the petition has been submitted?

Once the petition is submitted, officers figure out how many are valid (people have to live, work or study within Manchester City Council’s boundaries.

We already have almost 1000 so we would definitely be appearing in front of the Neighbourhoods and Environment Scrutiny Committee but we want to get 4000 to trigger a debate in a Full Council meeting. We want all 96 councillors to hear our case and vote on what to do next.

The debate might end with them rejecting, or it might end with a committee coming into existence.

Is there anything else we can do to join the campaign, besides signing the petition?

A TONNE of ideas – see our handbook…

Telling your friends and work colleagues about it in general conversation or via personalised email

Share on social media and participate in our seven social media blitzes.

Print off a copy and get people in your social bubble who can sign to sign (including kids), then email us and we will come collect the sheet.

climate change petition QR code

Put a poster in your window with the QR code.

Ask your local cafe / shop if they will display a poster with a QR code in their window.

Invite us to attend an online meeting of any group you are part of.

Make a video as a resident of a specific ward (Hello, I’m x from y ward…).

Make a video as someone who speaks a certain language.

As a parent, as an ex, y or z. Make and share memes/gifs about any of this!

Thanks Marc!
If you want to get more involved, you can find CEM via their website, Twitter, Instagram and Youtube.

By Stitched Up

First published on the Stiched Up website on 10 September 2020

Feature image: Fraser Cottrell on Unsplash

Share this article

  • Guest Writer

    This article was written by one of our guest writers. If you'd like to write for us, get in touch.


Reader Interactions


  1. A seventh Committee (or meaningful rearrangement of the current 6) would be helpful. Particularly when we see what MCC has done with the issue of air pollution from diesel emissions over the last say 10 years.

    And harmful PM2. 5 pollution has hardly even been recorded and will continue to occur with eg electric cars. Of course, Government direction provides unfortunate leeway on all of this and the main focus is on ‘process’ (‘By 20xx, we’ ll aim to …) rather than on ‘content’ – measurable, per annum changes that can be measured and held on to.

    Covid19 has shown many of us a different way forward that appears to be good for more of the people more of the time.

    I realise that air pollution is a fraction of the climate change issue but nevertheless an important contribution to health and wellbeing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *